Welcome to Cambridge, Coffee, and Crime

This is where I write about crime fiction, Cambridge, old buildings, awkward secrets, and the occasional suspicious orchid.

  • While I didn’t move to Cambridge until 1984, the city I arrived in still carried the atmosphere of the late 1970s. Close enough to 1977 for me to relate to it, and still in many ways untouched by the more sweeping changes that came later. It was the Cambridge I knew in my late twenties, and the Cambridge I chose as the setting for The Orchid Mystery.

    Back then, the city felt gentle, walkable, and self-contained. It was a place where history wasn’t confined to college walls or chapel façades but ran under your feet and beside your bicycle wheels. There were fewer cars. The pace was slower. And there was something human-sized about it all. The skyline was still dominated by spires, not cranes. The shops were mostly independent. You knew where to get your bread, your coffee, your mended shoes. Nothing glittered, but everything felt solid.

    The most visible change from the 1970s to the early 80s was the gradual redevelopment of the Kite area. At the time I moved to the city, the Grafton Centre had just been completed in its first phase. Back then, it reached only as far as the exit by the Old Druid’s Pub and the short-lived Presto’s supermarket, which closed in 1988. The rest came later. The expansion swallowed up old side streets and the remaining patchwork of terrace houses and corner shops. What had once been a quiet, slightly rundown residential area was replaced by a more modern shopping complex, but one still modest by today’s standards.

    I was away from Cambridge for most of the 1990s, and when I returned, I was surprised by how little had changed. That is, until recently. Today, Cambridge is a different place. A city of bio labs, tech campuses, and start-ups, with house prices that feel surreal. The medieval bones remain, but they are dressed in glass and steel. That divide between town and gown still exists in subtle ways, but it no longer defines the city as sharply as it once did.

    Back in the late 70s, it was unmistakeable. There was the university, with its wealth, formality, and rituals, and there was the town, home to those who made things work. I had a friend who worked as a bedder at one of the colleges. As a Kiwi, I found the name strange and the role even stranger; someone paid to tidy up after students, make beds, clean grates. It was a role steeped in hierarchy, but there was affection in it too. She knew who was up late, who had been crying, who was sneaking in boyfriends. It was all part of the unofficial undercurrent that kept the place human.

    There was something about that Cambridge—a city suspended between ancient traditions and modern uncertainty—that made it the perfect backdrop for a mystery novel. That’s why The Orchid Mystery is set in 1977. It was a year on the cusp. Politically and socially, Britain was teetering. Strikes, inflation, and the long aftermath of the war still shadowed daily life. The glamour of the 60s had faded, and the Thatcher era had not yet begun. It was a moment of ambiguity, and ambiguity is fertile ground for fiction.

    In Cambridge, those larger uncertainties were mirrored in the college cloisters and quiet courts. The university was slowly modernising, admitting more women and students from state schools, but the old ways lingered. There were whispered scandals, unspoken rules, and rooms that hadn’t been redecorated since before the war. What better place to hide a body, or a secret?

    The city’s geography also played a role in the story. The winding alleys, the hidden gardens, the locked staircases that only Fellows had keys to, all of it helped build a world where mystery could breathe. In 1977, there were fewer cameras, less traffic, fewer distractions. People noticed things. Or didn’t. Silence was easier to come by.

    When I walk through Cambridge today, I still see flashes of that older world. The light catching on college stone, the smell of warm paper in the university library, the clatter of a bicycle over cobblestones. But I also feel a sense of loss. The small shops are mostly gone, the city feels busier, shinier, more professional. The divide between past and present is harder to navigate.

    So I return, through writing, to the Cambridge of 1977. A place of shadows and secrets. A place where the modern world was arriving, but hadn’t yet taken over. A place where a body found in a college garden would raise more questions than answers.

  • Cambridge is beautiful, but that is not the whole story.

    It was a town before it was a university: a town on the River Cam, close to the Fens, with the damp air, flat land and mist that still give Cambridge much of its atmosphere. The mist is part of the appeal, of course, but it also suits the place in another way. Cambridge has always been very good at making things disappear into vagueness.

    The University did not arrive in an empty landscape. It settled into an existing town and gradually acquired power over it. The relationship between town and gown was not just a picturesque old rivalry involving gowns and undergraduates behaving badly. It was about authority. Who made the rules? Who enforced them? Who was protected? Who was punished?

    Cambridge has always been very good at presenting control as tradition.

    One of the nastier examples was the treatment of young women. The University became deeply anxious about women tempting male students and dealt with the problem in the usual way: by policing the women. Young women could be pursued, arrested and imprisoned on suspicion of associating with undergraduates. The men were, inconveniently, the reason for the anxiety. The women were simply easier to punish.

    There is an irony here. Cambridge University’s own origin story is linked to scholars fleeing Oxford after violence connected to the death of a woman, possibly a prostitute, although the details are disputed. Yet Cambridge later became notorious for treating young women as a moral danger to men.

    There is probably a name for that. Projection, perhaps. Or scapegoating. An institution with its own uneasy history placing the burden of male behaviour on women with far less power.

    That is the Cambridge I keep coming back to in crime fiction: not because it is pretty, though it certainly is, but because it is so practised at looking respectable. The punts, chapels and colleges are part of it. So are the rules, privilege, secrecy and punishment.

    For a murder mystery, that is far more useful than scenery.